1. Introduction and Goals

This section provides an overview of the system’s goals and stakeholders.

2. Architecture Constraints

List of technical, organizational, and other constraints.

3. System Context and Scope

3.1. System Context

structurizr SystemContext 001

4. Solution Strategy

4.1. Technology

Which techonologies are used in the solution?

4.2. Methods for high-level design

Which methods are used for high-level design?

5. Building Block View

5.1: System Context

structurizr Container 001

5.2: Container

structurizr Component 001

6. Runtime View

It shows the behavior of one of several building blocks in the form of essential use cases.

6.1. Login use case

7. Deployment View

This section describes how the software system is deployed, including the hardware, software, and networking components.

7.1. Deployment Diagram

structurizr Deployment 001

8. Cross-cutting Concepts

Description of cross-cutting concerns such as security, performance, and logging.

8.1. Security

8.1.1. Authentication

8.2. Performance

8.3. Logging

9. Architecture Decisions Records

9.1. ADR-001: Login decision

9.1.1. Context and Problem Statement

We need to choose an authentication method for user login in our new application. The method should ensure security, ease of use, and scalability while providing a seamless user experience.

9.1.2. Considered Options

  • Option 1: Traditional Username and Password Authentication

  • Option 2: OAuth 2.0 with Social Login

  • Option 3: Single Sign-On (SSO) with SAML

9.1.3. Decision Outcome

We have decided to implement OAuth 2.0 with Social Login.

Rationale:

  • Security: OAuth 2.0 is a widely adopted and secure protocol for authorization.

  • User Convenience: Social login allows users to log in with existing accounts (e.g., Google, Facebook), reducing friction and improving user experience.

  • Scalability: OAuth 2.0 can handle a large number of users and integrates well with third-party identity providers.

  • Reduced Maintenance: Leveraging third-party identity providers reduces the burden of managing user credentials and security.

  • Adoption and Integration: Many users prefer using their social accounts for quick access, and many modern applications support OAuth 2.0, making it easier to integrate with other services.

9.2. ADR-002: Technology selection

9.2.1. Context and Problem Statement

We need to choose a technology stack for developing our new web application. The application requires a robust backend, an interactive frontend, and seamless integration with third-party services.

9.2.2. Considered Options

  • Option 1: Node.js with Express, React.js, PostgreSQL, AWS

  • Option 2: Python with Django, Angular, MySQL, Google Cloud Platform

  • Option 3: Ruby on Rails, Vue.js, MongoDB, Microsoft Azure

9.2.3. Decision Outcome

We have decided to use the following technology stack:

  • Backend: Node.js with Express framework

  • Frontend: React.js

  • Database: PostgreSQL

  • Hosting: AWS (using services such as EC2, S3, and RDS)

Rationale:

  • Node.js and Express: Chosen for their performance, scalability, and large ecosystem.

  • React.js: Selected for its component-based architecture, ease of use, and strong community support.

  • PostgreSQL: Preferred for its robustness, ACID compliance, and advanced querying capabilities.

  • AWS: Offers a reliable and scalable cloud infrastructure with a range of services that meet our needs.

10. Quality Scenarios

10.1. Performance

TODO: Describe performance-related quality scenarios.

10.2. Scalability

TODO: Describe scalability-related quality scenarios.

10.3. Reliability

TODO: Describe reliability-related quality scenarios.

10.4. Availability

TODO: Describe availability-related quality scenarios.

10.5. Security

TODO: Describe security-related quality scenarios.

10.6. Maintainability

TODO: Describe maintainability-related quality scenarios.

10.7. Portability

TODO: Describe portability-related quality scenarios.

11. Risks and Technical Debt

11.1. Risks

Identify and describe potential risks.

11.2. Technical Debt

Identify and describe technical debt in the system.

12. Glossary

Term Definition

Term 1

Definition of term 1

Term 2

Definition of term 2

Term 3

Definition of term 3

Term 4

Definition of term 4

Term 5

Definition of term 5